Professional judgement in accounting and Aristotelian practical wisdom
نویسندگان
چکیده
Purpose Recognising the growing importance of professional judgement within accounting, this paper examines how it relates to Aristotelian practical wisdom, with reference ethical failure at Carillion plc in 2018. This includes an examination these concepts are similar and they differ a reconceptualisation terms. Design/methodology/approach The conventional understanding is articulated accounting standards, institutions academic research. compared as presented Nicomachean Ethics. Both conceptualisations analysed plc. Findings Some similarities well significant differences between conceptualisation wisdom identified. Application shows judgement, concept, provides more adequate unethical behaviour. Research limitations/implications analysis identifies aspects that have not previously been explored empirically, but which nevertheless empirical support other domains. Practical implications Professional reconceptualised terms, informs bodies firms should conceive apply concept. Originality/value Although there has research on informed by psychology, little linking context. utilises philosophically perspective reconceptualise way failures.
منابع مشابه
Professional Judgement "
Professionals offer (and, we hope, deliver) honest and competent judgment. Perspectives has devoted many issues to the first of these, honesty, what we tend to call "professional ethics:' We have had little to say about the second, technical competence, what makes honest judgment professional. We have, it seems, simply taken it for granted. Yet, an engineer without engineering judgment, a lawye...
متن کاملIn Defence of Professional Judgement.
A judgement is an assertion made with evidence or good reason in a context of uncertainty. In psychiatry the uncertainty is inherent in the professional context, and the evidence derives from the academic literature and scientific studies as they are applied to a specific patient. The nature of the uncertainty and the factors which should inform professional judgement are explored. Professional...
متن کاملAccounting for the Discrepancies in the New Iranian EFL National Curriculum from the Professional and Practical Standpoints
Abstract The present investigation is an endeavor to scrutinize the Iranian EFL professors’ and teachers’ viewpoints towards the status quo as well as the constituents of the current Iranian EFL national curriculum. Two questionnaires based on teachers and experts’ focus groups and study’s objectives were designed. The participants of the study included 306 Iranian EFL teachers and 13 Iranian...
متن کاملAccounting for the Discrepancies in the New Iranian EFL National Curriculum from the Professional and Practical Standpoints
Abstract The present investigation is an endeavor to scrutinize the Iranian EFL professors’ and teachers’ viewpoints towards the status quo as well as the constituents of the current Iranian EFL national curriculum. Two questionnaires based on teachers and experts’ focus groups and study’s objectives were designed. The participants of the study included 306 Iranian EFL teachers and 13 Iranian ...
متن کاملDemocracy’s Wisdom: An Aristotelian Middle Way for Collective Judgment
Asatisfactory model of decision-making in an epistemic democracy must respect democratic values, while advancing citizens’ interests, by taking account of relevant knowledge about the world. Analysis of passages in Aristotle and legislative process in classical Athens points to a “middle way” between independent-guess aggregation and deliberation: an epistemic approach to decision-making that o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Accounting, auditing & accountability
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2051-3151', '0951-3574']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-09-2020-4949